If, after investigation, no case of Academic Misconduct is found against a student, no record will be kept on the student’s official record. In cases of involving falsification of third-party evidence (i.e., medical evidence) the Adjudicator may verify this with the provider whilst ensuring obligations to confidentiality are maintained at all times.Įxtenuating Circumstances will not normally be considered relevant in determining whether Academic Misconduct has occurred.Īcademic Misconduct and Extenuating Circumstances should be considered independently to one another with neither outcome being dependent on the other.Ī claim that Academic Misconduct has been committed unintentionally or accidentally cannot be considered as a defence to an allegation of Academic Misconduct. In investigating allegations of Academic Misconduct adjudicators can make use of TurnItIn software and submit the work of the student to it. Under no circumstances during any stage of the Academic Misconduct procedure will a student be granted an additional attempt at assessment beyond those normally permitted. Where allegations of suspected Academic Misconduct are being investigated, Departments should, where possible, check all available summative work the student has submitted within the same assessment period. In considering allegations of Academic Misconduct adjudicators should apply “on the balance of probabilities” as the standard of proof. Where successful completion of a programme of study will lead to part or full professional accreditation, membership of a professional body, or the right to practise professionally, UCL retains the rights to notify the relevant professional body and/or any UCL fitness to practise officer or panel to which such power has been delegated, of any proven Academic Misconduct. Students may seek advice on their case or the procedures from the Students' Union UCL Advice Service. Where the procedures refer to the Departmental Tutor, this may be delegated to the Programme Leader or Exam Board Chair. Where the procedures refer to the ‘Department’, this should be taken to also mean any departmental equivalents within UCL’s organisation structures, such as Division or Institute, and Departmental Tutor and Departmental Panel should be interpreted accordingly. Wherever in the procedures a holder of office is referred to, or where there is an obvious conflict of interest, the words 'or their nominee' are to be understood. Students studying at another institution with a formal Academic Partnership with UCL are subject to the procedures as outlined in the individual Memorandum of Agreement. Resulting issues of progression and award on the UCL degree should be decided by the relevant UCL Board of Examiners. The host institution should provide UCL with information on any cases of Academic Misconduct committed by a UCL student, including the penalty imposed. UCL students studying modules at other institutions are subject to the host institution's Academic Misconduct procedures. If UCL identifies Academic Misconduct, the information will be shared with the home institution. Incoming Intercollegiate and Affiliate students will normally be subject to the procedures of their home institution in cases where a penalty more severe than a mark reduction is under consideration. The Student Academic Misconduct Procedure applies to all methods of assessment and to both summative and formative assessment.Īny instances of Research Misconduct by taught or research students in work intended for publication will be investigated under UCL’s Procedure for Investigating and Resolving Allegations of Misconduct in Academic Research. These procedures apply to all current and former taught students of UCL, including Undergraduates, Taught Postgraduates and Postgraduate Research Students. The Student Academic Misconduct procedure sets out how UCL will investigate and penalise any conduct which is considered to breach UCL’s assessment regulations and which is likely to give an unfair advantage to the candidate and/ or affect the security of assessments and/ or affect the integrity of the degrees awarded by UCL. Download PDF version of Section 9: Student Academic Misconduct Procedureĩ.1 Introduction and Scope of Applicationĩ.5 Appealing an Academic Misconduct Decisionĩ.6 Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Educationĩ.1 Introduction and Scope of Application 1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |